Direct Answer
Algorithmic traders use a combination of real-time tick data, historical datasets, order book depth, and execution-quality data to build, test, and run strategies.
The specific mix depends on strategy type. High-frequency systems need microsecond-precision tick data and full depth of book. Longer-horizon strategies rely on cleaned historical data and may incorporate fundamental inputs.
NxCore provides the core data stack for algorithmic trading: tick-level real-time feeds, 20+ years of historical archives, and order book depth – all in one normalized format.
Why Data Selection Matters
The type and quality of data you choose directly affects strategy performance.
Choosing the wrong granularity is a common mistake. A tick-sensitive execution algorithm built on minute bars will fail. A weekly momentum strategy processing tick data is overengineered.
Match data to strategy requirements. NxCore’s single format across granularities and asset classes simplifies this alignment.
Core Data Types for Algorithmic Trading
| Data Type | What It Contains | Primary Use Case |
| Real-time tick data | Every trade and quote live | Signal generation, execution |
| Historical tick data | Archived tick records | Backtesting, model training |
| Level 2 / order book | Multiple price levels with size | Liquidity analysis, execution |
| Trade prints | Executed transactions | Volume analysis, trade flow |
| Corporate actions | Splits, dividends, mergers | Price adjustment, survivorship |
| Reference data | Symbol metadata, exchange codes | Normalization, identification |
| Execution data | Fills, slippage, latency | TCA, execution quality |
Most algorithmic traders work with multiple types simultaneously. A single strategy might use historical ticks for development, live ticks for signals, and depth for execution.
How NxCore Supports Algorithmic Trading
NxCore provides the complete data stack:
- Real-time tick data – all U.S. equities, options, futures
- Historical tick data – 20+ years, same format as live
- Order book depth – full Level 2 from supported exchanges
- Corporate actions – splits, dividends applied
- Reference data – symbol mapping, exchange codes
- Single format – consistent across all asset classes and time periods
One integration covers research, backtesting, and production.
Data Requirements by Trader Type
| Trader Type | Essential Data | Why It’s Needed |
| HFT / Market making | Tick + full Level 2 + microsecond timestamps | Execution in microseconds, queue position matters |
| Intraday quantitative | Tick + 1-second bars + depth | Signals depend on spread dynamics |
| Statistical arbitrage | Historical + real-time tick + corporate actions | Pair relationships need calibration and live monitoring |
| Execution algo developer | Depth + trade prints + latency metrics | Fill quality requires order book understanding |
| Swing / position | Daily bars + corporate actions | Longer holding reduces tick needs |
NxCore covers all these use cases with one data source.
NxCore vs. Assembling Multiple Data Vendors
| Approach | NxCore | Multiple Vendors |
| Integration effort | Single API | Multiple APIs, formats |
| Format consistency | One schema | Normalization required |
| Asset coverage | Equities + options + futures | Often separate vendors |
| Historical + live alignment | Same format | Format mismatches common |
| Pricing | Flat fee | Multiple contracts |
| Vendor management | One relationship | Multiple relationships |
Assembling data from multiple vendors introduces format mismatches, timestamp inconsistencies, and integration overhead. NxCore provides a unified solution.
Real-World Example
A statistical arbitrage fund trading correlated ETF pairs needs:
- Historical tick data – identify mean-reversion relationships across thousands of pairs
- Real-time tick data – detect spread deviations triggering live signals
- Level 2 depth – assess liquidity before entering positions
- Corporate actions – adjust for ETF rebalances and distributions
- Execution data – measure slippage and refine execution
With NxCore, the fund accesses all of this through one integration. Historical and live data use identical formats – backtests directly transfer to production without format conversion.
Common Mistakes
- Using bar data for tick-sensitive strategies – minute bars hide spread dynamics
- Ignoring timestamp precision – second-level timestamps corrupt signal logic
- Not adjusting for corporate actions – splits create false signals
- Mixing data sources without normalization – format differences cause errors
- Underestimating Level 2 importance – strategies ignoring depth face worse execution
- Using survivorship-biased history – inflates backtest returns
- Overengineering data for strategy needs – daily strategies don’t need nanosecond data
Frequently Asked Questions
Do all algorithmic traders use tick data?
Most do for intraday strategies. Longer-horizon strategies can use bars. NxCore provides both granularities in consistent format.
Is Level 2 data required for all strategies?
No. It matters for strategies depending on liquidity or order book dynamics. NxCore provides Level 2 for users who need it.
Can I build profitable strategies with only minute bars?
Yes, for swing or position strategies. Anything trading frequently or reacting to spreads needs tick data.
What’s the difference between historical and real-time data?
Historical is archived and cleaned. Real-time is live. NxCore provides both in the same format – backtests match production.
How do I handle data from multiple exchanges?
Normalize into consistent format. NxCore does this automatically – one format for NYSE, NASDAQ, OPRA, CME.
What to Do Next
Identify your strategy type and match it with appropriate data granularity.
NxCore provides the complete stack – tick data, depth, history, corporate actions – in one format. Research, backtesting, and production use the same data source.